Democrats Disproven…Again In Addition To 1 Time To A Greater Extent Than In Addition To Again

Democrats Have Perpetuated ‘False,’ ‘Unfair And Unfounded’ Attacks
‘Three Pinocchios’ For Leahy ‘Throwing Red Meat’ On Bush-Era Surveillance Program
“Considering the context, Kavanaugh’s e-mail inward the days later 9/11 is a slim reed on which to hang an allegation of potentially misleading testimony nether oath. Leahy asked whether Kavanaugh had seen or heard anything virtually a specific program, together with Kavanaugh said no. No evidence has surfaced showing Kavanaugh knew at the fourth dimension that a spying programme was beingness developed earlier or later he sent the e-mail to [John] Yoo. Even though Leahy is careful to say Kavanaugh ‘might have’ misled the Senate, he’s all the same throwing cherry meat out without much to dorsum him up, together with he gets Three Pinocchios for this one.” (David Lat, “In Defense Of Judge Brett Kavanaugh,” Above The Law Blog, 9/10/2018)

• LAT: “So, inward conclusion, this ‘perjury’ declaration is without merit — an unfair together with unfounded prepare on against Judge Kavanaugh.” (David Lat, “In Defense Of Judge Brett Kavanaugh,” Above The Law Blog, 9/10/2018)

PREVIOUSLY

‘False’: Judge Kavanaugh Did Not Call Contraceptives ‘Abortion-Inducing Drugs’
“Did Brett Kavanaugh telephone band nascency command abortion-inducing drugs? No … We charge per unit of measurement this declaration False.” (Did Brett Kavanaugh Call Birth Control Abortion-Inducing Drugs? No,” Politifact, 9/10/2018)

WASHINGTON POST’S FACT CHECKER: “[Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA)] earns Four Pinocchios -- together with her immature homo Democrats should drib this talking point.” (“Did Brett Kavanaugh Signal He Supports ‘Going After Birth Control’?,” The Washington Post’s Fact Checker Blog, 9/11/2018)

‘Exaggerated’: ‘Democrats Overstate Kavanaugh’s Writings on the Affordable Care Act’
“As they essay to block his nomination to the Supreme Court, Senate Democrats accept exaggerated Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s hostility to the Affordable Care Act inward his world statements together with writings.” (“Democrats Overstate Kavanaugh’s Writings on the Affordable Care Act,” The New York Times, 7/12/2018)

• “Judge Kavanaugh has written ii dissenting opinions inward the legal challenges to the Affordable Care Act spell serving on the the States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In both cases, he refrained from making wide pronouncements virtually the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, said Wendy Parmet, a professor of wellness police draw at Northeastern University.” (David Lat, “In Defense Of Judge Brett Kavanaugh,” Above The Law Blog, 9/10/2018)
  
  • LAT: “So, inward conclusion, this ‘perjury’ declaration is without merit — an unfair together with unfounded prepare on against Judge Kavanaugh.” (David Lat, “In Defense Of Judge Brett Kavanaugh,” Above The Law Blog, 9/10/2018)
  PREVIOUSLY
  
  ‘False’: Judge Kavanaugh Did Not Call Contraceptives ‘Abortion-Inducing Drugs’
  “Did Brett Kavanaugh telephone band nascency command abortion-inducing drugs? No … We charge per unit of measurement this declaration False.” (Did Brett Kavanaugh Call Birth Control Abortion-Inducing Drugs? No,” Politifact, 9/10/2018)
  
  WASHINGTON POST’S FACT CHECKER: “[Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA)] earns Four Pinocchios -- together with her immature homo Democrats should drib this talking point.” (“Did Brett Kavanaugh Signal He Supports ‘Going After Birth Control’?,” The Washington Post’s Fact Checker Blog, 9/11/2018)
  
  ‘Exaggerated’: ‘Democrats Overstate Kavanaugh’s Writings on the Affordable Care Act’
  “As they essay to block his nomination to the Supreme Court, Senate Democrats accept exaggerated Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s hostility to the Affordable Care Act inward his world statements together with writings.” (“Democrats Overstate Kavanaugh’s Writings on the Affordable Care Act,” The New York Times, 7/12/2018)

‘Disingenuous’: ‘Democrats Aren’t Telling The Full Story About What Kavanaugh Said’ On Investigating Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 President
“Democrats pounced on a years-old declaration past times president Donald Trump’s U.S. Supreme Court alternative Brett Kavanaugh to drum upward line of piece of job concern virtually how he powerfulness shield the president from Robert Mueller’s investigation…. But nosotros establish that Democrats aren’t telling the total storey virtually what Kavanaugh said.” (“Trump's Supreme Court Pick Said Presidents Shouldn't Be Investigated, Schumer Said,” Politifact, 7/10/2018)

NOAH FELDMAN, Harvard Law Professor: “Properly understood, Kavanaugh’s expressed views genuinely back upward the contrary conclusion: that the president tin survive investigated together with perhaps fifty-fifty indicted unless Congress passes a police draw maxim he can’t — which Congress has non done.” (Noah Feldman, “Kavanaugh’s Papers Don’t Help Trump Avoid Indictment,” Bloomberg Opinion, 7/10/2018)

Michigan State University police draw professor calls Democrats’ claims “disingenuous.” (“Trump’s Supreme Court Pick Said Presidents Shouldn’t Be Investigated, Schumer Said,” Politifact, 7/10/2018)

---

Tags: Democrats Disproven, Again, faux reports, Judge Kavanaugh To part or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please yell / link to the together with "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
Sumber https://arkansasgopwing.blogspot.com/