Another Gauge Targets Christianity, Discards Constitution
. . . 'Nonsensical' ruling regarding flight privately owned aircraft.
by Dr. Alan Keyes:Congress shall brand no constabulary respecting an institution of religion, or prohibiting the gratuitous practice thereof.... (United States Constitution, Amendment I)
The enumeration inwards the Constitution of sure enough rights shall non hold upwards construed to deny or disparage others retained past times the people. (U.S. Constitution, Amendment IX)
The powers non delegated to the U.S. of A. of America past times the Constitution, nor prohibited past times it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. (U.S. Constitution, Amendment X)
No nation shall brand or enforce whatsoever constabulary which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;...nor shall whatsoever state...deny to whatsoever individual inside its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. (U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV, Section 1)
Judge Denise Casper has ruled against a Christian's access to a programme that routinely hoists privately owned flags over a metropolis building, terminal that other flags are acceptable because they're non religious. "The city's policy of excluding non-secular flags is viewpoint neutral because it excludes faith equally a dependent area affair of vocalization communication on the flagpole.... The metropolis has permissibly chosen to exclude faith equally a dependent area matter, rather than equally ane perspective alongside many on other subjects." ("Judge endorses ban on Christian flag")
There are times when a federal judge's blatant disregard for the unambiguously plainly linguistic communication of the U.S. Constitution defies all argue together with mutual sense. Because this is an assertion nearly the Constitution, Americans who are non lawyers (much less constitutional scholars) ofttimes assume that they are forbidden from using their mutual feel to criticize around judge's idiocy. However, the Constitution relies, straight or indirectly, on the argue together with mutual feel of ordinary citizens to perform the most of import business office of sovereign power, which is to select the people responsible for its use. American citizens receive got to brand judgments nearly all the officials inwards the governments (national, nation together with local) who are supposed to stand upwards for them.
People ofttimes remark on the fact that, inwards comparing with all the written constitutions afterwards produced, the U.S. Constitution is remarkable for its brevity and, with few exceptions, its purpose of linguistic communication readily understood past times ordinary folks. Tragically, self-serving elitists determined to impose oligarchic dominion on the people of the U.S. of A. of America receive got encouraged the sentiment that constitutions, laws, together with other legal documents are exactly beyond the purview of untrained minds. They receive got become, similar the arms of medieval knights, totems of power, upon which those uninitiated inwards the arcane mysteries of the legal profession may exclusively hold off from afar together with never presume to touch.
I supposed this is why federal judges similar Denise Casper assume their errant nonsense volition non hold upwards closely scrutinized past times members of the sovereign trunk of the people charged, inwards their capacity equally voters, with overseeing (through their elected representatives) the purpose together with abuse of regime powers derived, according to America's founding premises, from their consent. In the representative nosotros are considering, Judge Casper pretends to process religious vocalization communication equally ane dependent area affair together with non-religious vocalization communication equally a affair of diverse perspectives. Given the swell diversity of religions, this is a distinction that makes no difference, except to supply comprehend for blatantly prejudicial discrimination against whatsoever together with all religious perspectives.
But it also distracts from the most relevant fact, which is that the U.S. Constitution forbids interference with the gratuitous practice of religion. This prohibition applies to religious expression, whether equally dependent area affair or equally a affair of perspective. One could combat that this prohibition forbids imposing this or that religious perspective upon conscience, past times forcefulness of law. But it does non preclude interfering with faith inwards full general equally a dependent area affair of speech. However, when the people of the U.S. of A. of America ratified the Constitution, Christianity was the predominant faith alongside them. Christ parted from his followers with the ascendancy to "Go together with instruct all nations." Teaching requires speech. Therefore, the purpose of vocalization communication to portion religious dependent area affair is essential to the gratuitous practice of the Christian religion.
Ages earlier Americans produced the U.S. Constitution, Christ's imperative made it correct (according to God) to preach the Christian religion. Christians did so equally individuals. But they also did so equally communities. Hence the fact that constitutions adopted past times the diverse states earlier the U.S. Constitution, including that of Massachusetts, referred to God's authority. More to the point, they implemented the Christian agreement that God's authority, past times his endowment of right, substantiates the pregnant of justice (i.e., determines its content). Most states referred to this fact inwards their constitutions, flags, together with other tokens of sovereign authority. Their ability to do so was a affair of unalienable right, endowed past times God. It was thus alongside the powers non delegated to the U.S. of A. of America (Congress shall brand no law, etc.) together with thus "reserved to the states, respectively, or to the people."
But it was also clear show that, earlier ratification of the U.S. Constitution, Americans possessed the private correct to freely accolade God, according to their Christian religious conscience, inwards speech, writing, together with other forms of expression. The Ninth Amendment explicitly forbids whatsoever structure of the enumeration of rights inwards the Constitution that denies or disparages the retained (and thus antecedent) rights of the people. This immunity from interference that this prohibition entails, commencement attested inwards the context of the regime of the United States, is so affirmed inwards honour of the states, past times the 14th Amendment.
The logic that makes nonsense of Judge Casper's determination is non rocket science. It is non around arcane mystery fathomable exclusively to legal initiates. It was together with is the mutual feel of the American people, rooted inwards reverence for the pre-eminence of God – without which, the whole thought of our self-government equally a people has no logically reasonable foundation inwards principle. Soon together with real soon, nosotros must fully awaken to this truth, or it volition perish.
--------------
Alan Keyes was Asst Secretary of State for International Organizations together with an Ambassador to the United Nations Economic together with Social Council nether President Reagan. Keyes ran for president inwards 1996, 2000 together with 2008, together with was a candidate for the U.S. Senate for Maryland inwards 1988 together with 1992 together with for Illinois inwards 2004 against Barack Obama. He writes for Renew America where he commencement shared this article together with blogs at LoyaltoLiberty.com.
Tags: U.S. District Judge, Denise Casper, Massachussetts, rules against, privately owned flags, religious flags, Alan Keyes, commentary To portion or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please cite / link to the together with "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks! Sumber https://arkansasgopwing.blogspot.com/
by Dr. Alan Keyes:
The enumeration inwards the Constitution of sure enough rights shall non hold upwards construed to deny or disparage others retained past times the people. (U.S. Constitution, Amendment IX)
The powers non delegated to the U.S. of A. of America past times the Constitution, nor prohibited past times it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. (U.S. Constitution, Amendment X)
No nation shall brand or enforce whatsoever constabulary which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;...nor shall whatsoever state...deny to whatsoever individual inside its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. (U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV, Section 1)
 |
| Judge Denise Casper U.S. District of Massachusetts |
There are times when a federal judge's blatant disregard for the unambiguously plainly linguistic communication of the U.S. Constitution defies all argue together with mutual sense. Because this is an assertion nearly the Constitution, Americans who are non lawyers (much less constitutional scholars) ofttimes assume that they are forbidden from using their mutual feel to criticize around judge's idiocy. However, the Constitution relies, straight or indirectly, on the argue together with mutual feel of ordinary citizens to perform the most of import business office of sovereign power, which is to select the people responsible for its use. American citizens receive got to brand judgments nearly all the officials inwards the governments (national, nation together with local) who are supposed to stand upwards for them.
People ofttimes remark on the fact that, inwards comparing with all the written constitutions afterwards produced, the U.S. Constitution is remarkable for its brevity and, with few exceptions, its purpose of linguistic communication readily understood past times ordinary folks. Tragically, self-serving elitists determined to impose oligarchic dominion on the people of the U.S. of A. of America receive got encouraged the sentiment that constitutions, laws, together with other legal documents are exactly beyond the purview of untrained minds. They receive got become, similar the arms of medieval knights, totems of power, upon which those uninitiated inwards the arcane mysteries of the legal profession may exclusively hold off from afar together with never presume to touch.
I supposed this is why federal judges similar Denise Casper assume their errant nonsense volition non hold upwards closely scrutinized past times members of the sovereign trunk of the people charged, inwards their capacity equally voters, with overseeing (through their elected representatives) the purpose together with abuse of regime powers derived, according to America's founding premises, from their consent. In the representative nosotros are considering, Judge Casper pretends to process religious vocalization communication equally ane dependent area affair together with non-religious vocalization communication equally a affair of diverse perspectives. Given the swell diversity of religions, this is a distinction that makes no difference, except to supply comprehend for blatantly prejudicial discrimination against whatsoever together with all religious perspectives.
But it also distracts from the most relevant fact, which is that the U.S. Constitution forbids interference with the gratuitous practice of religion. This prohibition applies to religious expression, whether equally dependent area affair or equally a affair of perspective. One could combat that this prohibition forbids imposing this or that religious perspective upon conscience, past times forcefulness of law. But it does non preclude interfering with faith inwards full general equally a dependent area affair of speech. However, when the people of the U.S. of A. of America ratified the Constitution, Christianity was the predominant faith alongside them. Christ parted from his followers with the ascendancy to "Go together with instruct all nations." Teaching requires speech. Therefore, the purpose of vocalization communication to portion religious dependent area affair is essential to the gratuitous practice of the Christian religion.
Ages earlier Americans produced the U.S. Constitution, Christ's imperative made it correct (according to God) to preach the Christian religion. Christians did so equally individuals. But they also did so equally communities. Hence the fact that constitutions adopted past times the diverse states earlier the U.S. Constitution, including that of Massachusetts, referred to God's authority. More to the point, they implemented the Christian agreement that God's authority, past times his endowment of right, substantiates the pregnant of justice (i.e., determines its content). Most states referred to this fact inwards their constitutions, flags, together with other tokens of sovereign authority. Their ability to do so was a affair of unalienable right, endowed past times God. It was thus alongside the powers non delegated to the U.S. of A. of America (Congress shall brand no law, etc.) together with thus "reserved to the states, respectively, or to the people."
But it was also clear show that, earlier ratification of the U.S. Constitution, Americans possessed the private correct to freely accolade God, according to their Christian religious conscience, inwards speech, writing, together with other forms of expression. The Ninth Amendment explicitly forbids whatsoever structure of the enumeration of rights inwards the Constitution that denies or disparages the retained (and thus antecedent) rights of the people. This immunity from interference that this prohibition entails, commencement attested inwards the context of the regime of the United States, is so affirmed inwards honour of the states, past times the 14th Amendment.
The logic that makes nonsense of Judge Casper's determination is non rocket science. It is non around arcane mystery fathomable exclusively to legal initiates. It was together with is the mutual feel of the American people, rooted inwards reverence for the pre-eminence of God – without which, the whole thought of our self-government equally a people has no logically reasonable foundation inwards principle. Soon together with real soon, nosotros must fully awaken to this truth, or it volition perish.
--------------
Alan Keyes was Asst Secretary of State for International Organizations together with an Ambassador to the United Nations Economic together with Social Council nether President Reagan. Keyes ran for president inwards 1996, 2000 together with 2008, together with was a candidate for the U.S. Senate for Maryland inwards 1988 together with 1992 together with for Illinois inwards 2004 against Barack Obama. He writes for Renew America where he commencement shared this article together with blogs at LoyaltoLiberty.com.
Tags: U.S. District Judge, Denise Casper, Massachussetts, rules against, privately owned flags, religious flags, Alan Keyes, commentary To portion or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please cite / link to the together with "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks! Sumber https://arkansasgopwing.blogspot.com/
Another Gauge Targets Christianity, Discards Constitution
Reviewed by Saputra
on
9:50 PM
Rating:
Reviewed by Saputra
on
9:50 PM
Rating:
No comments: